Finland's best flight price comparison service 2026
A buyer searching for flights asks whether the comparison service charges them anything, how many airlines the search covers and who is really behind the service. These decide 50 points out of 100.
momondo.fi · momondo.com A/S (Denmark); the affiliate tag "momondo-kyk-wl" (kyk = Kayak) in the page's own JSON configuration reveals the Kayak connection; Kayak and momondo both belong to the Booking Holdings group; no Finnish business ID (Y-tunnus)
52.0SCORE
Booking fees100
Number of airlines0
Company information100
Basic metrics · 31.9
Digital quality59
Transparency15
Reachability10
AI quality score38
+ The front page meta description promises a wide search: 'Cheap flights - Compare flights and find the best flight tickets', and the service covers, in addition to flights, accommodation, car rental and package holidays
Basic metrics: 31.9, rank 4 · ▲ 3 places
– Number of airlines: The pages say they compare "hundreds" of sites, but the number of airlines is not mentioned on the front page, the About us page or the How we work page.
lentovertailu.fi · The site's own contact page: the site's technology and maintenance are handled by "Espoo-based Silky Sand Media"; opened 2007; a PRH search for "Silky Sand Media" does not find the company; no business ID (Y-tunnus) on the site
48.5SCORE
Booking fees50
Number of airlines90
Company information50
Basic metrics · 35.7
Digital quality63
Transparency15
Reachability22
AI quality score39
+ The contact page tells the site's own history openly: opened in 2007 as one of the first Finnish-language flight comparison sites, completely renewed in 2012, technology handled by the Espoo-based Silky Sand Media
travellink.fi · Travellink AB, filial i Finland (PRH 1728205-9), the Finnish branch of the Swedish Travellink AB; belongs to the Spanish Opodo/eDreams ODIGEO group
44.5SCORE
Booking fees0
Number of airlines100
Company information100
Basic metrics · 39.0
Digital quality52
Transparency22
Reachability40
AI quality score44
+ A wide range of routes is visible directly in the link structure of the flights page: named airlines (KLM, Lufthansa, Finnair, airBaltic, Wizz Air, Air France) and concrete routes (Helsinki-Amsterdam, Helsinki-Paris, Turku-Gdańsk)
Basic metrics: 39.0, rank 2 · ▼ 1 place
– Booking fees: Service fees are not mentioned on the front page, the cheap flights page or the last-minute page. The terms page could not be read automatically.
lentohakukone.fi · The owning company cannot be found on the site at all: no business ID (Y-tunnus), no Oy name, no privacy policy or terms of use page linked from the front page
39.5SCORE
Booking fees100
Number of airlines0
Company information0
Basic metrics · 28.9
Digital quality62
Transparency15
Reachability0
AI quality score30
+ The front page text describes the service's coverage in words fairly precisely: 'compares prices from hundreds of airlines', covers both traditional and low-cost airlines, and also helps find hotels 'from over 35 intermediaries and 350,000 hotels'
Basic metrics: 28.9, rank 5 · ▲ 1 place
– Number of airlines: The front page says it compares the prices of “hundreds” of airlines, but the exact number is not on the front page. Info, FAQ and contact pages were not found (404).
skyscanner.fi · Skyscanner Limited, a private limited company, registered in England and Wales under company number 04217916 (the site's own "Terms" page); founded 2003; Ctrip (now Trip.com Group) acquired the company in 2016 for 1.4 billion pounds (the site's own "About us" page); no Finnish business ID (Y-tunnus)
22.4SCORE
Booking fees0
Number of airlines0
Company information0
Basic metrics · 44.7
Digital quality62
Transparency30
Reachability40
AI quality score46
+ Highly transparent about its own history: 'About us' -page describes in detail the founding year 2003, the goal of showing all flight options in one place, and the 2016 acquisition by Ctrip (now Trip.com Group) for 1.4 billion pounds
Basic metrics: 44.7, rank 1 · ▼ 4 places
– Booking fees: The page is a JavaScript application, and our reader could not render it. The static HTML contains only the heading.
QUESTIONDoes the service charge me anything for searching or booking?
Whether the service states on its own pages that it is free and has no booking fees.
Free and no booking fees = 100, does not sell tickets but free admission not stated = 50, fees in the terms = 0.
25 p
Number of airlines
QUESTIONHow many airlines does the search cover?
Number of airlines stated by the service itself.
600 airlines or more = 100 points, 100 or fewer = 0, in between directly proportional.
14 p
Company information
QUESTIONDo I know who is behind the service?
Does the service name the company and its registry or VAT number.
Company and ID named = 100, company named without ID = 50, not named = 0.
11 p
Basic metrics
Digital quality, transparency, reachability and AI quality score
Basic metrics × 0.5
50 p
Notes
The comparison includes five flight search services. Scores are based only on what the service's own pages say about booking fees, the number of airlines and company information.
Skyscanner's page is a JavaScript application that our reader could not render, so its values are empty and it has not been scored by guesswork. Missing data for the other services is marked separately.
Travellink is a travel agency that sells tickets itself. Its possible service fees were not found on the front page or the last-minute page, so the fee section is empty.
About this comparison
Flight search engines compare hundreds of airlines and travel agencies at once. We scored 5 flight price comparison services used in Finland on 19 metrics. The key question: can you see the final total price in the search result, or do extra charges only appear on the booking page?
What transparency means in this category
The final total price (including handling fees) shown in search results (30), filters (schedule, stopovers, baggage) available (15), earnings model (commissions/affiliate) disclosed openly (15), comparison coverage (airlines/travel agencies) disclosed (15), business ID (Y-tunnus) or official company identifier shown (10), independent review source shown (15)
How to read the comparison correctly: Half of the points come from buyer's questions, i.e. things the buyer finds out before deciding. The other half measures how openly the company publishes its prices, terms and contact details. Clear differences in points indicate a genuine difference: one tells you the price immediately, another only after logging in. Close scores should not be read as a ranking order, because every measurement has a margin of variation. The measurement accuracy and the full calculation formula are open in the methodology.
Customer experience is brought into the assessment separately. We also collect customer feedback and customer experiences about companies through separate surveys. The survey results will be added to the overall assessment later.
No prices are visible without JavaScript, and no points were awarded for it. Search results of all five services render in the browser; in a static load none of them shows a single euro price. Skyscanner also rejects an automated browser with a separate bot-block challenge. This does not mean the services would not show prices to a real user in a browser, it means that total-price transparency (whether the user sees handling fees immediately or only on the booking page) could not be confirmed from public source code, so the metric is honestly "no" for all five.
momondo is a sister service of Kayak, but does not tell you so. The page's own technical JSON data contains the identifier "momondo-kyk-wl" (kyk = Kayak), which reveals a connection to the Booking Holdings group. This is not mentioned anywhere in the user-visible parts of the site. Skyscanner, by contrast, tells its ownership history openly: Ctrip (now Trip.com Group) bought it in 2016 for £1.4 billion.
None of the five has a Finnish business ID (Y-tunnus) on its site. Travellink.fi's PRH registration (Travellink AB, filial i Finland, 1728205-9) was found in the trade register but not on the site itself. The operator named by Lentovertailu.fi, "Silky Sand Media", cannot be found in the PRH at all. We do not recommend individual flights and do not compare actual flight prices; we measure the comparison services' own openness.
Are you listed and would like to rank higher?
The free pre-analysis shows every item where your company loses points and which rank fixing it is enough for. The paid analysis shows what the items are and how to fix them.
Can't find your company on the list even though it should be there? Get in touch and we will include it in the next measurement round.